(Tunnel Vision + Hard Work) / < Procrastination = 72% HUBBUB
(Tunnel Vision + Hard Work) / < Procrastination = 72% HUBBUB
Probabilities for an X-Class Solar Flares, Earth bound Kp 6/7 CME’s , >7M earthquakes, and > VEI 3’s may be elevated in the weeks/months to come due to inner planatary graviation flux coupled with colateral Jupiter/Saturn proximity and the upcoming transit of Venus. Look at the below example of space time planetary distortion. It may be noted that the proximity of Mercury, Venus, Earth, Earth’s Moon, and Mars will create a INNER SOLAR SYSTEM GRAVITATIONAL FLUX. This effect is scaled by an unbalance of space/time equalibrium. The end result will be ENERGY directed inbound (CME’s) and outbound (Earthquakes/Volcanoes) -OR- the simplistic PUSH-PULL equalization effect.
+/- 10 degrees of equatorial arc of planetary alignment in the inner solar system with Jupiter prominence.
The below are profound public statements made by by Nikola Tesla:
1. When the great truth accidentally revealed and experimentally confirmed is fully recognized, that this planet, with all its appalling immensity, is to electric currents virtually no more than a small metal ball and that by this fact many possibilities, each baffling imagination and of incalculable consequence, are rendered absolutely sure of accomplishment; when the first plant is inaugurated and it is shown that a telegraphic message, almost as secret and non-interferable as a thought, can be transmitted to any terrestrial distance, the sound of the human voice, with all its intonations and inflections, faithfully and instantly reproduced at any other point of the globe, the energy of a waterfall made available for supplying light, heat or motive power, anywhere — on sea, or land, or high in the air — humanity will be like an ant heap stirred up with a stick: See the excitement coming!
2. I hold that space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can have no properties. It might as well be said that God has properties. He has not, but only attributes and these are of our own making. Of properties we can only speak when dealing with matter filling the space. To say that in the presence of large bodies space becomes curved is equivalent to stating that something can act upon nothing. I, for one, refuse to subscribe to such a view.
3. Today’s scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.
4. Einsteins relativity work is a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king… its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists.
I would like to add the following (***via solar resonance frequency data transmission)
5. Einstein is no different than Alexander Bell, and Bell no different than Edison…..this is called the “continuum of evolutionary prominence”….in simplistic terms these scientific heroes are the same now as then. Refer to their textbook constants our schools have been teaching us to this day and undisputed by most, They formulated mathematical equations defined by rules bound to a set of constants. This prove and disprove relationship may be visually understood by viewing the below:
This set of constants is now realized as “wandering constants”. All one has to do is look at the experimentation container. As our container (earth) currently binds us by its invisible force field, its constants continually change….thus wandering constants. Is magnetic north a constant or a variable?
6 . How can nothing travel faster than the speed of light when the light is directly affected by its conduit. (i.e. container, surrounding, environment) ? If it had no container, environment, or surrounding, how can it be measured? Water bends light, thus would the visual scientist conclude light travels faster than its container from its birth? If light was faster, would it not reach earth before the container the light travels along based on the BB Theory. How can one clock the speed of light without knowing the container for the light to travel along? What direction would the light travel in? Can anyone factually prove the direction, speed, and continuity of light in an environment of variables as is presented in the cosmos?
Look at the photo below, the glass jar of water is a conduit for the light , it directs the light, without the water in the jar, the light direction is optical refraction, with the water, the light bends to a definitive point. YET, the speed of the light directed by the water is controlled by the distant it travels, water volume, and particle mass in the water.
Look at the below, the clouds (H20) direct the light.
H2O is a conduit for cosmic light. Bodies of water have full control and act as conduits in the cosmos. They channel the light along space……example…….place several spheres of H20 and then aim high intensity photons in any direction…..eventually the photons will be directed by one of the spheres of water. Where does the initial sphere(s) of water channel this light to? To another another H2O sphere. The light is in H2O’s full control, it channels light by bending, refraction, speed, absorption, etc…..this light will then continue UNTIL reaching another sphere of H20….so on and so on….light is channeled by H20.
If we look at the container synergistically…In other words, the environment containing the spheres of water. Add resonance to the entire container with frequency near equilibrium……the spheres of water will act as one….
Scientific Discovery: Scientist observed bacteria samples would immediately disperse at the exact time of a solar coronal mass ejection (CME) that is directed towards the earth. Light takes 8 minutes to reach the earth. CME’s vary from 32 to 40 hours to reach the earth. SOLAR RESONANCE has an immediate effect on H20. Empty vacuum? void of space? void of matter? empty space? anyway you say it, is it nothing more than terms for 100 yr old textbook constants? I am awaiting the discovery of alien bacteria existing without H20 <<—–I guess I just included Stephen Hawkins in the list of lifelong mathematical “ebbs and flows”….Again, refer to the Binary Star photo above for VISUAL SCIENTIFIC REPRESENTATION.
**** The transmission of data via light waves has revolutionized the communication age. Based on this, how does one truly know looking directly at the sun is impossible? From my experimentation, it is a gradual process. Repetition is the key. Intuition of personal senses play an important role.
To dissuade scientific controversy – I take the TESLA
“According to string theory, absolutely everything in the universe—all of the particles that make up matter and forces—is comprised of tiny vibrating fundamental strings. Moreover, every one of these strings is identical. The only difference between one string and another, whether it’s a heavy particle that is part of an atom or a massless particle that carries light, is its resonant pattern, or how it vibrates.”
Can particle composition change, create, and/or split into another composition based on its harmonic resonance?
Is the resonance frequency of a particle derived by its space time proximity to matter, energy, and/or forces?
Upon researching Nikola Tesla’s writings, one will note Tesla somehow was a receptor for information. Tesla would construct a concept in his mind, built the prototype in his mind, and work out the details, again, in his mind. Was Tesla a conduit channeling the sun’s resonance? (Resonance >>Frequency >> Data) . Tesla’s continuous dream of “burning on the face of the sun” was very real as described in his own words.
Nano Hydro Turbine research.
Please contact me if you would like to assist in beta testing.
I noticed a unique alignment in the making. How exciting!!!
(Source: Solar System Scope)
Recycled 2 liter plastic bottles have many uses. The below photos show step-by-step instructions for making “Self Watering” planters: View the article “2 Liter Bottle Garden Examples” to see garden plants growing in the bottle garden.
Gravitation = nothing can exist on it’s own accord
Quote from answers.com:
“Why can’t you see the back side of the moon?”
You cannot see the “back side of the Moon” because that is the part of the Moon that faces away from the earth. When you look at the Moon, you always see the “front side,” the side that faces Earth.
This is because the Moon is in synchronous rotation, which means it rotates on its axis in about the same time it takes to orbit the Earth. This results in it keeping nearly the same face turned towards the Earth at all times. This is caused by gravity, and the Moon is said to be “tidally locked” with the Earth.
I would consider the front side being a position of anything I observe opposite my field of vision provided it is illuminated. The front of a car is opposite my field of vision; the front of a aircraft is opposite the pilot and passengers field of vision; when I knock on your front door, it is opposite my field of vision.
In our solar system, we consider the front side as being the side of an object directly opposite the sun (facing the sun). When I view the moon, am I looking at the front side or the backside? From my perspective, I am viewing the front side. From the sun’s perspective, I am facing neither the front side nor the backside. I am facing that portion of the moon that is illuminated by the sun. If earth is the moon’s source of illumination from my perspective then again, I am neither facing the front side nor the backside. I now know that I am not the point of measurement for determining what is the front side and what is the backside.
The front side of anything is that area opposite the source of illumination otherwise I wouldn’t see it. Yet, if I take out the “human visable spectrum“, the front side is the side of an object opposite and facing whatever it is attracting or pulling on it. On earth the front side is the side facing the sun. At night, I would be on the backside. Yet, if I take gravity into account, the front side of two objects would be the area of gravitational flux between the two objects opposite one another.
The front side in space is the gravitational field itself between two objects. (pulling or attraction)
Based on the above, it would seem there is no back side in space. Yet, if one were to examine opposites, the back side in space is the source (or object) facing and pushing all other objects outwards. (pushing or expansion)