As to not create posts that may become controversial, I want to explain the basis of posts I start. It is important this site follows its definitive name:
“astro” and “synergy”.
Once again, I must start by acknowledging these thoughts are not of my own research, education, or experience. We have all heard the statement ” I take the fifth” in a court of law. I am restructuring this statement for application (or plea) in the science community, THUS, the statement is: “I take the TESLA”.
I must also agree with Dr. Emoto, that my eyes are the scale of measurement in experimentation. I do not direct exerted energy for efforts to “PROVE” or “DISPROVE” the concepts. My personal opinion parallels Dr. Emoto’s statement on “the double jeopardy rules of science”. My minuscule reasoning could be based on the current LAWS of PHYSICS, hence, the “PROVE” and “DISPROVE” exertion may cancel one another out THUS creating a complete “flat line” of energy, the exact position before reaching “the event horizon”, or “stagnation”. If this is off balance, we may get a redirected exertion of energy based on the greater. Please note I stated “redirected exsertion of energy” instead of the common term “wasted energy” . How can I waste energy if I neither create or destroy energy? When I act in a negative manner, my energy level will become below equilibrium – this is redirection of energy by an effect and is non-directional on my behalf as a conduit. Whereas, above equilibrium can be directed due to superconducting. Superconducting is stepping up the energy released per energy received. Equilibrium is mysterious in that we continue to set the +/- as a definitive point.
I ask us to consider all the textbook constants that have now been deemed invalid.
Again, “I take the TESLA“
(* example only)