Gravitation = nothing can exist on it’s own accord
Gravitation = nothing can exist on it’s own accord
Quote from answers.com:
“Why can’t you see the back side of the moon?”
You cannot see the “back side of the Moon” because that is the part of the Moon that faces away from the earth. When you look at the Moon, you always see the “front side,” the side that faces Earth.
This is because the Moon is in synchronous rotation, which means it rotates on its axis in about the same time it takes to orbit the Earth. This results in it keeping nearly the same face turned towards the Earth at all times. This is caused by gravity, and the Moon is said to be “tidally locked” with the Earth.
I would consider the front side being a position of anything I observe opposite my field of vision provided it is illuminated. The front of a car is opposite my field of vision; the front of a aircraft is opposite the pilot and passengers field of vision; when I knock on your front door, it is opposite my field of vision.
In our solar system, we consider the front side as being the side of an object directly opposite the sun (facing the sun). When I view the moon, am I looking at the front side or the backside? From my perspective, I am viewing the front side. From the sun’s perspective, I am facing neither the front side nor the backside. I am facing that portion of the moon that is illuminated by the sun. If earth is the moon’s source of illumination from my perspective then again, I am neither facing the front side nor the backside. I now know that I am not the point of measurement for determining what is the front side and what is the backside.
The front side of anything is that area opposite the source of illumination otherwise I wouldn’t see it. Yet, if I take out the “human visable spectrum“, the front side is the side of an object opposite and facing whatever it is attracting or pulling on it. On earth the front side is the side facing the sun. At night, I would be on the backside. Yet, if I take gravity into account, the front side of two objects would be the area of gravitational flux between the two objects opposite one another.
The front side in space is the gravitational field itself between two objects. (pulling or attraction)
Based on the above, it would seem there is no back side in space. Yet, if one were to examine opposites, the back side in space is the source (or object) facing and pushing all other objects outwards. (pushing or expansion)
Moon photos taken on March 27, 2010. Click photos to view full resolution (3,008px × 2,000px) .
We have heard these two terms: “The Void of Space” and “Space is an Empty Vacuum”
(1) Do you think space in an empty void (vacuum)?
– OR –
(2) A solid, gas, and/or fluid continuum?
(3) What’s your take on space?
Please post below.
Here’s a few Wikipedia articles to mix things up a bit:
As to not create posts that may become controversial, I want to explain the basis of posts I start. It is important this site follows its definitive name:
“astro” and “synergy”.
Once again, I must start by acknowledging these thoughts are not of my own research, education, or experience. We have all heard the statement ” I take the fifth” in a court of law. I am restructuring this statement for application (or plea) in the science community, THUS, the statement is: “I take the TESLA”.
I must also agree with Dr. Emoto, that my eyes are the scale of measurement in experimentation. I do not direct exerted energy for efforts to “PROVE” or “DISPROVE” the concepts. My personal opinion parallels Dr. Emoto’s statement on “the double jeopardy rules of science”. My minuscule reasoning could be based on the current LAWS of PHYSICS, hence, the “PROVE” and “DISPROVE” exertion may cancel one another out THUS creating a complete “flat line” of energy, the exact position before reaching “the event horizon”, or “stagnation”. If this is off balance, we may get a redirected exertion of energy based on the greater. Please note I stated “redirected exsertion of energy” instead of the common term “wasted energy” . How can I waste energy if I neither create or destroy energy? When I act in a negative manner, my energy level will become below equilibrium – this is redirection of energy by an effect and is non-directional on my behalf as a conduit. Whereas, above equilibrium can be directed due to superconducting. Superconducting is stepping up the energy released per energy received. Equilibrium is mysterious in that we continue to set the +/- as a definitive point.
I ask us to consider all the textbook constants that have now been deemed invalid.
Again, “I take the TESLA“
(* example only)
I’ve been stagnant for quite some time (mostly below equilibrium)….then the sun produced an amazing CME. “Active sunspot 1123 erupted during the early hours of Nov. 12th, producing a C4-class solar flare and apparently hurling a filament of material in the general direction of Earth.on Nov 13”
I live directly on the eastern seaboard. We’ve been experiencing dramatic “booms” (quakes) since Nov. 15. Being a former pilot, I was certain this was due to military jets breaking the sound barrier in offshore training exercises. For the past few days I couldn’t make to connection (audibly speaking) . I experienced several today and would run outside to record sound to verify if it was due to military training. I attempted to reason what these quake like sonic “booms” were coming from and I agree with the author of this article that indeed these are being created by military exercises far offshore (in other words past the distant of populated land disturbances) BUT then I went back to school on the physics of “what is the sound barrier” – see excerpt from http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-the-sound-barrier.htm below:
“Since the speed of sound is based on the temperature of the medium it travels through, there is no constant speed at which the sound barrier will be broken. To give a general idea, many scientific publications list the speed of sound at 742 miles per hour (1194 kilometers per hour) based on a standard temperature of 32 degrees Fahrenheit (0 degrees Celsius.) But as the temperature shifts upward, so the sound barrier speed increases.”
Now wait a second, as you go up in the atmosphere, the temperature decreases. Not to mention it has been upper 30’s for the low and low 60’s for the high the past week…..not making sense huh….man I was right back where I started…..until I viewed the NICT movie archive from 2010-11-15 (Nov 15)….low and behold I witnessed the largest impact I’ve seen the GMF (earth’s geomagnetic field) take since I’ve been monitoring all the cool space bound devices we have at our fingertips….yes I will repeat WE HAVE AT OUR FINGERTIPS (if your may be really confused now, take a look-see at http://www.solarcycle24.com/for an overview)
Okay….so where does that leave me now……well take a look at the below video archieve from the NICT on 2010-11-15 below (http://www2.nict.go.jp/y/y223/simulation/realtime/movie.html)
WOW….what an impact huh……go GMF!!!!. For a great overview of of earth’s magnetic field check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_magnetic_field
So where does that leave me…..positive charged particles made it through the GMF and are trapped between the GMF and the earth’s surface….this raises the temp’s in the upper atmosphere due to water molecules and positively charged particles exchanging energy OR at the rate the exchange takes place…the relative humidity has been low the past week (averaging 30-40%)….it will take some time for these charged particles to exchange energy (note I said exchange energy NOT dissipate….IMO energy doesn’t dissipate….it exchanges to other mediums or as I like to say “conduits”….we see an event in the exchange such as lighting, steam, Aura Borealis, etc..etc….BTW, I bases this off the general scientific community’s agreement that ” energy cannot be created NOR can it be destroyed”
Man I love an ENERGIZED earth….my battery has been recharged….yeah!!! (for those MATRIX fans out there….yes, it is true we are all conduits of energy too and each of us had an magnetic field -OR -as the movie put it HUMAN BATTERIES – LOL
Now, if I were still practicing verbal resonance in “D minor” as Dr Emoto explains….I may be superconducting right now.
These are technically called “Crepuscular rays” (say that 3 times real fast)
I learned of Nikola Tesla while in engineering school. For the past 2 years I have been studying his work. Google “Nikola Telsa” and see for yourself. The below if my favorite quote from Telsa:
” When the Great Truth, accidentally revealed and experimentally confirmed, is fully recognized, that this planet, with all its appalling immensity, is to electric currents virtually no more than a small metal ball and that by virtue of this fact many possibilities, each baffling imagination and of incalculable consequence, are rendered absolutely sure of accomplishment; when the first plant is inaugurated and it is shown that a telegraphic message, almost as secret and non-interferable as a thought, can be transmitted to any terrestrial distance, the sound of the human voice, with all its intonations and inflections faithfully and instantly reproduced at any other point of the globe, the energy of a waterfall made available for supplying light, heat or motive power, anywhere … on sea, or land, or high in the air … humanity will be like an ant heap stirred up with a stick. See the excitement coming ! “
— Nikola Tesla ……. Electrical World and Engineer, March 5, 1904
Body of H2O (cubic yards) needed for lunar gravitational influence (ebb and flow)