EMP Shielding Concept:
Large body of water with subterranean groundings or alternative conduit.
EMP Shielding Concept:
Large body of water with subterranean groundings or alternative conduit.
Algae turbine concept:
In Feb. 2010, I documented a 15 minute down-pour along the southeastern NC coast. Afterwards, I visually and audibly documented ground water and ground saturation transfer its state from liquid to steam and rise upwards in the atmosphere. The transfer of state was immediate in nature. It is most difficult to offer a comparison. I can only describe this as angelic in theory.
This was at the exact moment of a Kp 7+ geomagnetic plasma bombardment. I was relieved. Why? Because this was the 2nd time I visually documented H20 protecting the earth from intensive solar plasma. The 1st time was on Jan. 20, 2010. During the afternoon of Jan 20, 2010, I visually showed a group of viewers how atmospheric H20 was transferring intense proton plasma particles. This could be seen in the upper atmosphere and visually followed the contours of geomagnetic field lines.
So here I am this morning (2012-01-23 :: 0721). I awake to a 100% saturated atmosphere. All weather forecasting show otherwise. I immediately KNOW we are once again experiencing a massive plasma bombardment.
Recommended readings for basis:
On earth, we have the saying “King of the Jungle”. In the Cosmos, what would you nominate the “King of the COSMOS”?
I admire the simplistic curiosities of SIR ISSAC NEWTON: “Isaac Newton described comets as compact and durable solid bodies moving in oblique orbits, and their tails as thin streams of vapor emitted by their nuclei, ignited or heated by the sun. Newton suspected that comets were the origin of the life-supporting component of air. Newton also believed that the vapors given off by comets might replenish the planets’ supplies of water (which was gradually being converted into soil by the growth and decay of plants), and the sun’s supply of fuel.” (Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comet)
King of the COSMOS NOMINATION
I for one would like to nominate H2O as a front runner for the title “KING OF THE COSMOS”. When a comet is observed returning after breaching a Black Hole’s event horizon, surely it will be deemed KING OF THE COSMOS.
Can our terrestrial Deep Sea somewhat be an oppositori comparison to the dramatic force of Black Holes in the cosmos? How fascinating the ever-so changing constants in the observed continuum of infinitum
I stumbled upon NOVA’s “Journey of the Butterflies”. This is about the 2,000-mile migration of monarch butterflies to a sanctuary in the highlands of Mexico (http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/nature/journey-butterflies.html)
I noticed the below excerpt from a page on the site monarchwatch.org titled “top 10 facts on Monarchs” :
Migrating monarchs in the interior of the continent fly in directions that seem to be geographically appropriate given the need to reach Mexico. How the butterfly determines these directions is the unanswered navigation question. Components of the navigational system that are known involve a time-compensated sun compass linked to the circadian clock, and a protein (Cry1) that is sensitive to blue light and ultraviolet wavelengths.”
1. Has anyone conducted resonance studies on the migratory destination?
2. At what frequency range does the final destination in Mexico resonate?
3. At what frequency range does the originating migratory area resonate?
4. At what frequency range does the intervened originating area of Washington DC resonate? (from the documented study)
5. What is the deviation of the originating area to the intervened area?
6. What is the frequency the Monarch’s resonate while in flight?
7. What is the deviation of the frequencies the Monarchs resonate compared to the originating migratory area and the migratory destination?
I have been researching planetary resonance. All the planets in our solar system including the sun resonate at various frequencies. Could resonance be the navigational answer to the migratory path of the Monarchs?
Stay tuned for this outstanding article!!!
The below are profound public statements made by by Nikola Tesla:
1. When the great truth accidentally revealed and experimentally confirmed is fully recognized, that this planet, with all its appalling immensity, is to electric currents virtually no more than a small metal ball and that by this fact many possibilities, each baffling imagination and of incalculable consequence, are rendered absolutely sure of accomplishment; when the first plant is inaugurated and it is shown that a telegraphic message, almost as secret and non-interferable as a thought, can be transmitted to any terrestrial distance, the sound of the human voice, with all its intonations and inflections, faithfully and instantly reproduced at any other point of the globe, the energy of a waterfall made available for supplying light, heat or motive power, anywhere — on sea, or land, or high in the air — humanity will be like an ant heap stirred up with a stick: See the excitement coming!
2. I hold that space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can have no properties. It might as well be said that God has properties. He has not, but only attributes and these are of our own making. Of properties we can only speak when dealing with matter filling the space. To say that in the presence of large bodies space becomes curved is equivalent to stating that something can act upon nothing. I, for one, refuse to subscribe to such a view.
3. Today’s scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.
4. Einsteins relativity work is a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king… its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists.
I would like to add the following (***via solar resonance frequency data transmission)
5. Einstein is no different than Alexander Bell, and Bell no different than Edison…..this is called the “continuum of evolutionary prominence”….in simplistic terms these scientific heroes are the same now as then. Refer to their textbook constants our schools have been teaching us to this day and undisputed by most, They formulated mathematical equations defined by rules bound to a set of constants. This prove and disprove relationship may be visually understood by viewing the below:
This set of constants is now realized as “wandering constants”. All one has to do is look at the experimentation container. As our container (earth) currently binds us by its invisible force field, its constants continually change….thus wandering constants. Is magnetic north a constant or a variable?
6 . How can nothing travel faster than the speed of light when the light is directly affected by its conduit. (i.e. container, surrounding, environment) ? If it had no container, environment, or surrounding, how can it be measured? Water bends light, thus would the visual scientist conclude light travels faster than its container from its birth? If light was faster, would it not reach earth before the container the light travels along based on the BB Theory. How can one clock the speed of light without knowing the container for the light to travel along? What direction would the light travel in? Can anyone factually prove the direction, speed, and continuity of light in an environment of variables as is presented in the cosmos?
Look at the photo below, the glass jar of water is a conduit for the light , it directs the light, without the water in the jar, the light direction is optical refraction, with the water, the light bends to a definitive point. YET, the speed of the light directed by the water is controlled by the distant it travels, water volume, and particle mass in the water.
Look at the below, the clouds (H20) direct the light.
H2O is a conduit for cosmic light. Bodies of water have full control and act as conduits in the cosmos. They channel the light along space……example…….place several spheres of H20 and then aim high intensity photons in any direction…..eventually the photons will be directed by one of the spheres of water. Where does the initial sphere(s) of water channel this light to? To another another H2O sphere. The light is in H2O’s full control, it channels light by bending, refraction, speed, absorption, etc…..this light will then continue UNTIL reaching another sphere of H20….so on and so on….light is channeled by H20.
If we look at the container synergistically…In other words, the environment containing the spheres of water. Add resonance to the entire container with frequency near equilibrium……the spheres of water will act as one….
Scientific Discovery: Scientist observed bacteria samples would immediately disperse at the exact time of a solar coronal mass ejection (CME) that is directed towards the earth. Light takes 8 minutes to reach the earth. CME’s vary from 32 to 40 hours to reach the earth. SOLAR RESONANCE has an immediate effect on H20. Empty vacuum? void of space? void of matter? empty space? anyway you say it, is it nothing more than terms for 100 yr old textbook constants? I am awaiting the discovery of alien bacteria existing without H20 <<—–I guess I just included Stephen Hawkins in the list of lifelong mathematical “ebbs and flows”….Again, refer to the Binary Star photo above for VISUAL SCIENTIFIC REPRESENTATION.
**** The transmission of data via light waves has revolutionized the communication age. Based on this, how does one truly know looking directly at the sun is impossible? From my experimentation, it is a gradual process. Repetition is the key. Intuition of personal senses play an important role.
To dissuade scientific controversy – I take the TESLA
“According to string theory, absolutely everything in the universe—all of the particles that make up matter and forces—is comprised of tiny vibrating fundamental strings. Moreover, every one of these strings is identical. The only difference between one string and another, whether it’s a heavy particle that is part of an atom or a massless particle that carries light, is its resonant pattern, or how it vibrates.”
Can particle composition change, create, and/or split into another composition based on its harmonic resonance?
Is the resonance frequency of a particle derived by its space time proximity to matter, energy, and/or forces?
Upon researching Nikola Tesla’s writings, one will note Tesla somehow was a receptor for information. Tesla would construct a concept in his mind, built the prototype in his mind, and work out the details, again, in his mind. Was Tesla a conduit channeling the sun’s resonance? (Resonance >>Frequency >> Data) . Tesla’s continuous dream of “burning on the face of the sun” was very real as described in his own words.